Tobias Pfefferkorn, researcher in injection
molding and mold technology at IKV, says conventional hot-runner
injection molding is subject to unequal temperatures and pressures
of melt entering multiple cavities. These differences can mean
different viscosities and filling and cooling profiles, resulting
in parts with different dimensions and properties.
Pfefferkorn says another limitation
of conventional injection tooling is that a hot-runner system
tends to be designed for optimum performance with a particular
mold and material and may not work as well in a totally different
application.
IKV developed a mold with a special electrically
heated hot half on the stationary side of the mold (see
diagram).
The hot half has a melt-transfer chamber that stores the melt
from the screw and then transfers the melt into the mold cavity
by means of a piston/cylinder system.
The cold half of the mold
is on the moving-platen side. Heat transfer between the hot and
cold halves is reduced by an insulating plate in the stationary
half. When the mold parting line closes, the piston/cylinder
compresses the melt-transfer chamber, pushing material through
the short gate directly into the mold cavity. In one sense, it
resembles two-stage injection with the melt accumulator or shooting
pot built into the mold. In this system, injection and holding
pressure is provided by the mold, not the screw, which remains
stationary.
|
| Sandwich molding and water-assist injection
were combined to make this armrest. The water cored out a virgin
PP center, producing a smooth, uniform inner surface, while obtaining
stiffness from the glass-filled PP skin.
|
After the holding-pressure phase, the transfer chamber
is filled with material for the next cycle. The main parting
line, which moves independent of the transfer chamber’s
actions, remains closed until the part is sufficiently cooled.
A
number of benefits are said to result. The melt-transfer part
of the mold is independent of part geometry and need not be changed
for different applications. Injection volume is determined by
the movement of this chamber. Using different cavity inserts
would reduce the total cost of multiple molds. Expensive hot-runner
temperature controls also are no longer needed. And due to
the short melt path and direct gating from the chamber to the
cavities, all cavities are filled equally using lower pressures
than would be possible with conventional hot runners. Less shear
and stress are imparted to the melt, Pfefferkorn claims, creating
parts with low shrinkage and warpage. Low shear can be advantageous
for molding long-glass reinforcements or ceramic-powder compounds.
IKV will soon test the process in a production mold with more
than 100 cavities. IKV has already achieved successful results
using polypropylene with long-glass fibers and in molding up
to 12 cavities.
Melding multiple processes
Ultra-thin-wall parts and glass-filled
hollow parts with a smooth inner surface are applications on
the cutting edge of molding today. To get there, molders use
processes such as sandwich molding, injection-compression molding,
and gas or water assist. While these advanced processes today
are usually used separately, combinations of these techniques
can achieve more sophisticated parts, reduce costs, or overcome
limitations of individual methods, says Christoph Lettowsky,
researcher in multi-component injection molding at IKV.
Lettowsky
evaluated process combinations of sandwich molding with injection-compression
and fluid-assist molding. The combinations all start with forming
the skin-core-skin sandwich structure in the mold.
“Combining
sandwich molding with injection-compression yields parts with
a more uniform core and skin distribution,” says
Lettowsky. “The
lower injection and filling pressures and the even compression
of the material during the compression process combine to give
a low level of material orientation to the part. This can result
in reduced shrinkage and distortion.” It
can also reduce cavity-pressure requirements, since the mold
is “open” during
filling.
MuCell Now Molded on Massive Machine
The
MuCell microcellular molding process from Trexel Inc., Woburn,
Mass., has been installed on the largest injection press yet,
a 1760-tonner from Dima Inc., Santa Fe Springs, Calif. The press,
which recently went into operation producing washing-machine
agitators, can handle shot sizes up to 225 oz. The press also
completes Dima’s TF series of fully hydraulic machines,
which includes seven other models from 80 to 1000 tons.

|
In addition, the compression step allows users to achieve
thinner skins and thinner walls overall. “Sandwich-with-compression
molding can produce thin-wall parts that cannot be produced with
conventional molding,” says
Lettowsky. “With conventional sandwich injection molding,
a wall of 1.5 mm was the thinnest we realized, while the test
part made with the sandwich/compression
process yielded a 1-mm wall.” On the other hand, he notes
that conventional sandwich molding allows a user to realize a
larger percentage of core material in the part.
A combination
of sandwich molding and water-assist molding was also tested
in molding an arm rest of long-glass PP and unfilled PP. Molders
had previously found that using water injection to core out fiber-reinforced
materials such as short-glass reinforced nylon 66 or long-glass
PP resulted in poor quality of the inner surface and dimensional
deviations of the hollow void in the part. “The
flow characteristics of the glass-filled resins made water-assist
processing difficult or impossible,” says Lettowsky.
He
devised a test utilizing a sandwich of 30% long-glass reinforced
PP skins over an unfilled PP core. The armrest mold is 30 mm
diam. and 500 mm long. When the water was injected, it cored
out just the unfilled material. Thus the outer layer provided
rigidity, toughness, and tensile and burst strengths, while the
inner layer had good barrier properties and a smooth inner surface.
(The validity of this approach has been confirmed by other
sources using it in commercial production. See Learn More box.)