Blending Revolution
Published

Internal Air Pressure vs. Vacuum Sizing for Ovality Issues?

To achieve more consistent ovality in an application like medical tubing extrusion, consider vacuum sizing. 

Share

Q. We’re extruding some medical tubing with 0.060-in. or smaller O.D. We have been using internal air pressure for sizing but have had intermittent problems with ovality. Would vacuum sizing offer any advantage?    —West Coast tubing processor

A. If ovality is your major concern, then the answer is yes. Using either contact or non-contact vacuum sizing greatly enhances the potential to improve ovality. You still need to be sure to center the die bushing so that the wall of the tube is concentric. If there is a thin spot in the wall, even with non-contact sizing, the thin spot will push out, leading to ovality.

With vacuum, once the tooling and associated drawdown are worked out, the repeatability is excellent and setup can be repeated in just 10-15 min. That’s because the differential pressure is created by the vacuum over the defined length of the chamber, and in-line cutting or coiling can cause only minimal tolerance variation. The other advantage of vacuum is that the weight of the water is actually removed from the tube as vacuum level is increased. With the internal air method, the operator must adjust the water level to improve ovality.


Bob Bessemer, sales manager, medical extrusion
Conair, Cranberry Township, PA
(724) 584-5500 • conairgroup.com

Related Content

Vacuum Tech for Plastics Manufacturers
Orbetron new for 2024 micro twin screw feeder
TracerVM Flow Meter features many display options
New Tinius Olsen VectorExtensometer testing
Go Beyond Blending
Trust the experts for fast & efficient changeovers
Improved Stainless 420 ESR
extrusion lines for encapsulant film for solar
Project-R