• PT Youtube
  • PT Facebook
  • PT Linkedin
  • PT Twitter
8/28/2012 | 1 MINUTE READ

NASA's 'Mars Rover' Has Many 3D Printed Parts

Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

A Fortus 3D printer from Stratasys, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minn., was used by NASA to help build a next-generation rover capable of supporting two humans on near-earth asteroids and Mars.

Related Suppliers

A Fortus 3D printer from Stratasys, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minn., was used by NASA to help build a next-generation rover capable of supporting two humans on near-earth asteroids and Mars. The rover is about the size of a Hummer and has a pressurized cabin and observation bubble.

NASA has been test-driving the vehicle in the Arizona desert, maneuvering it on the unforgiving terrain at weather conditions said to simulate those on Mars. About 70 rover parts were built digitally, directly from computer designs, in a production-grade Stratasys 3D printer. It uses the company’s patented Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology for the creation of complex shapes through additive manufacturing.

NASA engineers chose the FDM method because it uses production-grade thermoplastics like ABS, PC, and PC/ABS, which are lightweight but durable enough for rugged end-uses. The Mars rover parts include flame-retardant vents, pod doors, and many custom fixtures.

One ear-shaped exterior housing (shown) is deep and contorted, and would be nearly impossible to build without 3D printing, according to NASA test engineer Chris Chapman. He says NASA engineers also 3D print prototypes to test form, fit, and function of parts that will eventually be built in other materials. This validates part designs before committing to expensive tooling.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Melt Flow Rate Testing–Part 1

    Though often criticized, MFR is a very good gauge of the relative average molecular weight of the polymer. Since molecular weight (MW) is the driving force behind performance in polymers, it turns out to be a very useful number.

  • PBT and PET Polyester: The Difference Crystallinity Makes

    To properly understand the differences in performance between PET and PBT we need to compare apples to apples—the semi-crystalline forms of each polymer.

  • Injection Molding Wood-Plastic Composites

    Injection molders are just becoming acquainted with this new class of molding materials. It pays to learn some basic processing guidelines before jumping in.


Related Topics

Resources