Published

Part 1: The Importance of Consistent Fill Time

To make identical parts, you need to keep fill time constant. Here’s why.

Share

Molding is a complex process. If there are any doubts, consider the number of settings on injection molding machines, the complexity of the various controllers, the number of variables in the process and the significant fact that identical settings do not produce identical results. So, where you start?

Pick the variables you want to control and prioritize them. I wish there were a consensus as to which ones to watch, but I have yet to see it. One strategy is to track as many as possible, but few can interpret that much data. I follow Dr. Deming’s strategy: Fewer is better. First on my list to produce consistent functional parts is fill time. Fill time is defined as the time from the start of injection to when the screw reaches the transfer position, filling 90–99.9% of the part by volume. It is a “result,” not a setpoint.

Why is controlling fill time important? Basically, it is because the viscosity of plastics changes during production. To make identical parts, ideally you want the plastic to flow or fill the part or parts identically. If you have viscosity changes the flow pattern and balance to fill your parts will change. Parts will not be identical. Keeping fill the same attenuates viscosity changes. So, controlling fill time is critical. Before we go into the how to control fill time, let’s review the causes of viscosity change, some of which you can control and others you cannot: Here is my list:

 1.  Fill time. This is the main point of the viscosity curve: Plastics change viscosity if you change fill time. Plastics are shear-sensitive; that is, resins change viscosity dramatically with changes in injection speed. To make identical parts, you need to keep fill time constant. Believe it or not, shear has a larger impact on resin viscosity than temperature.

 2.  Resin temperature. Any variation in melt temperature due to barrel heaters or hot runners change melt viscosity

3.  Moisture content. Certain hygroscopic resins, like PC, nylon and PET, will suffer chain degradation due to hydrolysis if not dried properly. It’s not just splay you need to worry about. Infinitesimal amounts of residual water will greatly influence the viscosity of these materials. This amount of water is so small that you will not see splay in the part or foam at the nozzle, but it will react with the polymer and break the polymer chains. This reaction actually consumes water, reduces the viscosity and produces good-looking parts that will fail in end-use.

 3.  Lot-to-lot changes. Though certified to be within the specifications, resin lots can and do differ in viscosity.

 4.  Screw-rotate time. Since most of the energy to melt the plastic comes from the mechanics of the screw geometry and rpm, changes in screw-rotate time--a result, not a setpoint--cause viscosity variations.

 5.  Additive type and quantity. Usage of colors, fillers, mold releases, flow aids, antistats, antioxidants, regrind, etc. have an impact on viscosity. The quantity, type, size, how well mixed, etc. all add to the complexity of melt viscosity.

 6.  Mold temperature. The melt behaves as if the viscosity changed if you have a hotter or cooler mold.

With all these variables in viscosity, keeping fill time constant minimizes their influence and provides a more stable process and therefore consistent parts. Even though the resin can start out at a different viscosity, if driven to the same shear rate, viscosity variations are minimized, which provides a more consistent process.

Once you find a fill time that makes good parts, it is the fill time for the life of the mold. So how do you maintain that fill time? There are differences of opinion in the industry. In Part 2 I will cover how to keep fill time constant, along with procedures to check out your machines.

Bottom line: Run to run, shot to shot, summer to winter, and machine to machine, keep fill time the same and your process will be more consistent.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: John Bozzelli is the founder of Injection Molding Solutions (Scientific Molding) in Midland, Mich., a provider of training and consulting services to injection molders, including LIMS, and other specialties. Contact john@scientificmolding.com; scientificmolding.com.

Related Content

Biopolymers

Why (and What) You Need to Dry

Other than polyolefins, almost every other polymer exhibits some level of polarity and therefore can absorb a certain amount of moisture from the atmosphere. Here’s a look at some of these materials, and what needs to be done to dry them.

Read More
best practices

Formulating LLDPE/LDPE Blends For Abuse–Resistant Blown Film

A new study shows how the type and amount of LDPE in blends with LLDPE affect the processing and strength/toughness properties of blown film. Data are shown for both LDPE-rich and LLDPE-rich blends.

Read More

Are Your Sprue or Parts Sticking? Here Are Some Solutions

When a sprue or part sticks, the result of trying to unstick it is often more scratches or undercuts, making the problem worse and the fix more costly. Here’s how to set up a proper procedure for this sticky wicket.

Read More
best practices

The Effects of Temperature

The polymers we work with follow the same principles as the body: the hotter the environment becomes, the less performance we can expect.

Read More

Read Next

Materials Know How

Why (and What) You Need to Dry

Other than polyolefins, almost every other polymer exhibits some level of polarity and therefore can absorb a certain amount of moisture from the atmosphere. Here’s a look at some of these materials, and what needs to be done to dry them.

Read More
sustainability

Lead the Conversation, Change the Conversation

Coverage of single-use plastics can be both misleading and demoralizing. Here are 10 tips for changing the perception of the plastics industry at your company and in your community.

Read More
Recycling

Advanced Recycling: Beyond Pyrolysis

Consumer-product brand owners increasingly see advanced chemical recycling as a necessary complement to mechanical recycling if they are to meet ambitious goals for a circular economy in the next decade. Dozens of technology providers are developing new technologies to overcome the limitations of existing pyrolysis methods and to commercialize various alternative approaches to chemical recycling of plastics.

Read More