Click Image to Enlarge
A mere 2 mm of lime, calcium oxide, hydroxide, carbonates, etc. in a cooling channel will nearly triple the cooling time required, dramatically extending cycle times and draining profits. Source: Optimizing Injection Moulding by Thermal Images by Willi Stenko.
Infrared images of a molded part before and after cleaning of heating/cooling channels in the mold. The increased productivity was equivalent to 2500 production hours annually. Source: Optimizing Injection Moulding by Thermal Images by Willi Stenko.
One of the most significant reasons molders have difficulty in reproducing a process, from run to run and machine to machine, is that the mold cooling is either not done properly, not done consistently, or is inadequately documented.
Cooling and coolant flow through cooling lines are not subjects for debate. This is a well-defined science that is taken seriously and used without question in every other industry that deals with heat transfer. It is a required course for many engineering degree programs, and if you find someone who ever took a course in fluid dynamics, watch their face as you bring up the memory. Nearly everyone who had the class hated it and could not wait to sell their textbooks. Why? It was a dull class where you get told what to do, were provided the equations, and then challenged to do all the calculations as a drill and proof of mastery of the science.
There was no debate of the validity of the equations or concepts, or whether they work or are practical. These same rules apply in a molding shop. People may not get hurt physically if cooling is not done right, but they certainly may be injured financially. Cooling is about 95% of your cycle time, so it deserves proper attention.
Let’s start with some of the basics on heat transfer:
1. Heat transfer requires a difference in temperature between the fluid and the metal cooling channel.
2. Maximum change in temperature, in vs. out, is 2° C (4° F).
3. You must have turbulent flow, as defined by the Reynolds Number; my target is 5000.
4. Because cooling rate can influence part dimensions and properties, you must duplicate the cooling rate from run to run, machine to machine, for the life of the mold.
The first step with any mold, new or old, is to find out the diameter of each water line, often easily determined by the NPT thread size. Once you know the cooling line diameter and the water temperature, calculate the minimum gallons per minute (GPM) or liters per minute (LPM) need to achieve a Reynolds number of 5000. There are free calculators on Google, though most are more complicated than necessary. I suggest setting up the Reynolds Number Equation using a spreadsheet with a viscosity table vs. temperature of coolant. Now sum up the required GPM for all the lines on each mold half. This will be the minimum GPM need for this mold. With a good spreadsheet this should take you fewer than 30 minutes. Remember, there are no ifs, ands, or buts about this minimum GPM required.
The real problem is ensuring that each cooling line gets the required GPM, and it has to be the same every time the mold is mounted in a press. It has to be regulated. This is not such an easy task, since coolant takes the path of least resistance on different size water lines, especially if you have baffles or bubblers.
How close is your shop to having appropriate GPM, and is it regulated for each line? If you do indeed have everything in order, what happens if there is calcium, lime, rust, or some biological goo built up the inside of one or more of the lines? Let’s not pretend this does not happen, as some of you have seen lines completely blocked. Lines are sometime so badly fouled they have to be gun drilled out to clean them. What does this buildup on the inside of the cooling line do for heat transfer? The difference in in/out coolant temperature, or Delta T, drops astronomically, hence longer cycles and poor profits.
Figure 1 shows how a mere 2 mm of lime, calcium oxide, hydroxide, carbonates, etc., will nearly triple the cooling time required. Figure 2 shows thermal images of a mold before and after cleaning the water channels. In researching his book, Optimizing Injection Moulding by Thermal Images, Dr. Willi Stenko investigated more 700 molds and found 70% of them had extended cycle times due to fouled water lines, resulting in a revenue loss of about $60,000 per mold.
Dare I say that instead of spending money on the next Six Sigma Training, spend it on cleaning your molds. That would be a better return on investment. Our industry does not pay proper attention to cooling, water treatment, and keeping cooling channels clean. No ifs, ands or buts about that, either.