Automotive | 2 MINUTE READ

Now You Can Injection Mold Unpainted Automotive Soft Skins

New S-TPE for interior trim challenges slush molding and TPV competition.


Facebook Share Icon LinkedIn Share Icon Twitter Share Icon Share by EMail icon Print Icon

There’s a new way to make soft skins for automotive interior door panels, instrument panels, and consoles that is said to save considerable cost and weight compared with current methods such as slush molding or injection molding of TPV skins. Kraton Corp., Houston has developed new high-flow SEBS TPE materials that make it possible to injection mold ultra-thin (0.8-1 mm), lightweight soft skins that need no painting. These materials can be processed on existing standard equipment and are suitable for back-foaming or overmolding onto rigid PP substrates.

While Kraton has been presenting this new solution—which it calls injection molded soft-skin (IMSS) technology—to the auto industry for about a year in the form of 4 Å~ 6 in. plaques, the firm took a major step forward in January by inviting automotive OEMs and Tier 1 and 2 molders to a demonstration of injection molding a full-sized instrument-panel (IP) skin, using a tool Kraton commissioned to prove its point. The mold duplicates the A surface of a commercial slush-molded skin for a Ford Fusion. The mold was built by Hi-Tech Mold & Engineering, Rochester Hills, Mich., and was run on a 3000-ton Engel press at Hi-Tech’s prototyping and tryout facility.


According to Joe Schulcz, Kraton automotive market manager, the “workhorse” process for molding soft skins today is slush molding of PVC. The first slush-molded Kraton TPE applications are just now approaching commercialization. The biggest limitations of slush molding are that it is a specialized technology that is much less widely distributed than injection molding, and it is relatively slow, with cycle times of 4-5 min and sometimes longer. Kraton demonstrated IP-skin molding in 72 sec, and hopes to get that down below 1 min. The difference translates into a major cost advantage for Kraton IMSS.

Another advantage important to the auto industry is weight savings. Slush molded PVC has  density of 1.2 g/cc, vs. 0.9 for S-TPE. That amounts to a 25% weight savings from density alone, which increases to 30% or more when you consider thin-walling, Schulcz notes. Slush molded PVC skins are 1.1-1.2 mm thick, while Kraton IMSS skins potentially could be 1 mm or less. Schulcz considers this to be a major advance: “Achieving 1 mm or thinner walls in parts measuring 25-28 ft2 is a disruptive technology,” he states.

And there’s another benefit to consider. A unique aspect of Kraton IMSS is that it achieves high flow with low oil content (<5%). Up to now, such a high-flow S-TPE would require 30-50% oil loadings, which would result in bleeding and visible weld lines (not to mention odor and VOCs).

High oil content would require painting to cover such blemishes, as is the case with TPV skins, according to Schulcz. Kraton IMSS eliminates the need for paint and also reportedly improves aging, fogging, VOC and odor performance relative to slushmolded vinyl.

All this is made possible by two new high-flow Kraton SEBS resins. Whereas typical SEBS grades have MFIs in the range of 1 to 30, new Kraton MD6951 is 48 MFI and Kraton MD1648 is 200 MFI. Kraton developed IMSS compound recipes with these resins that have 500 MFI at 230 C (446 F). Schulcz says Kraton aims to supply the base SEBS resins to its compounding customers, who will supply fully formulated IMSS compounds to the automotive market.

He adds that his company has some injection molding know-how to offer to customers, too. The materials offer a “reasonably wide process window,” Schulcz says, though such very high flow requires some precautions to control flash, for example.